1972 Mazda 818 vs. 2004 Pontiac GTO
To start off, 2004 Pontiac GTO is newer by 32 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1972 Mazda 818. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1972 Mazda 818 would be higher. At 5,669 cc (8 cylinders), 2004 Pontiac GTO is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Pontiac GTO (350 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 271 more horse power than 1972 Mazda 818. (79 HP @ 5500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Pontiac GTO should accelerate faster than 1972 Mazda 818. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Pontiac GTO weights approximately 690 kg more than 1972 Mazda 818. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Pontiac GTO (495 Nm) has 371 more torque (in Nm) than 1972 Mazda 818. (124 Nm). This means 2004 Pontiac GTO will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1972 Mazda 818.
Compare all specifications:
| 1972 Mazda 818 | 2004 Pontiac GTO | |
| Make | Mazda | Pontiac |
| Model | 818 | GTO |
| Year Released | 1972 | 2004 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1586 cc | 5669 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 79 HP | 350 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 5200 RPM |
| Torque | 124 Nm | 495 Nm |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 1000 kg | 1690 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4100 mm | 4830 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1600 mm | 1850 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1410 mm | 1400 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2320 mm | 2720 mm |
