1972 Mazda 818 vs. 2004 Volvo V40

To start off, 2004 Volvo V40 is newer by 32 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1972 Mazda 818. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1972 Mazda 818 would be higher. At 1,950 cc (4 cylinders), 2004 Volvo V40 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Volvo V40 (169 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 101 more horse power than 1972 Mazda 818. (68 HP @ 6200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Volvo V40 should accelerate faster than 1972 Mazda 818. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Volvo V40 weights approximately 400 kg more than 1972 Mazda 818. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 1972 Mazda 818 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1972 Mazda 818. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Volvo V40, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Volvo V40 (240 Nm) has 148 more torque (in Nm) than 1972 Mazda 818. (92 Nm). This means 2004 Volvo V40 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1972 Mazda 818.

Compare all specifications: