1972 Mazda 818 vs. 2009 Mazda 6
To start off, 2009 Mazda 6 is newer by 37 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1972 Mazda 818. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1972 Mazda 818 would be higher. At 1,999 cc, 2009 Mazda 6 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Mazda 6 (147 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 79 more horse power than 1972 Mazda 818. (68 HP @ 6200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Mazda 6 should accelerate faster than 1972 Mazda 818. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Mazda 6 weights approximately 355 kg more than 1972 Mazda 818. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1972 Mazda 818 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1972 Mazda 818. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Mazda 6, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Mazda 6 (186 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 94 more torque (in Nm) than 1972 Mazda 818. (92 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 2009 Mazda 6 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1972 Mazda 818.
Compare all specifications:
1972 Mazda 818 | 2009 Mazda 6 | |
Make | Mazda | Mazda |
Model | 818 | 6 |
Year Released | 1972 | 2009 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1272 cc | 1999 cc |
Horse Power | 68 HP | 147 HP |
Engine RPM | 6200 RPM | 6500 RPM |
Torque | 92 Nm | 186 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 1000 kg | 1355 kg |
Vehicle Width | 1600 mm | 1800 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2320 mm | 2730 mm |