1972 Mazda 818 vs. 2010 Jeep Patriot
To start off, 2010 Jeep Patriot is newer by 38 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1972 Mazda 818. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1972 Mazda 818 would be higher. At 2,000 cc (4 cylinders), 2010 Jeep Patriot is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Jeep Patriot (158 HP @ 6400 RPM) has 90 more horse power than 1972 Mazda 818. (68 HP @ 6200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Jeep Patriot should accelerate faster than 1972 Mazda 818.
Because 1972 Mazda 818 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1972 Mazda 818. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Jeep Patriot, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2010 Jeep Patriot (191 Nm @ 5000 RPM) has 99 more torque (in Nm) than 1972 Mazda 818. (92 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 2010 Jeep Patriot will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1972 Mazda 818.
Compare all specifications:
1972 Mazda 818 | 2010 Jeep Patriot | |
Make | Mazda | Jeep |
Model | 818 | Patriot |
Year Released | 1972 | 2010 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1272 cc | 2000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 68 HP | 158 HP |
Engine RPM | 6200 RPM | 6400 RPM |
Torque | 92 Nm | 191 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Length | 4080 mm | 4409 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1600 mm | 1755 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1390 mm | 1669 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2320 mm | 2634 mm |