1972 Mazda Cosmo vs. 1959 Rover P4
To start off, 1972 Mazda Cosmo is newer by 13 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1959 Rover P4. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1959 Rover P4 would be higher. At 1,997 cc (4 cylinders), 1959 Rover P4 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1972 Mazda Cosmo (93 HP @ 7000 RPM) has 42 more horse power than 1959 Rover P4. (51 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1972 Mazda Cosmo should accelerate faster than 1959 Rover P4. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1959 Rover P4 weights approximately 438 kg more than 1972 Mazda Cosmo.
Let's talk about torque, 1959 Rover P4 (138 Nm @ 2000 RPM) has 5 more torque (in Nm) than 1972 Mazda Cosmo. (133 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 1959 Rover P4 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1972 Mazda Cosmo.
Compare all specifications:
1972 Mazda Cosmo | 1959 Rover P4 | |
Make | Mazda | Rover |
Model | Cosmo | P4 |
Year Released | 1972 | 1959 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1964 cc | 1997 cc |
Horse Power | 93 HP | 51 HP |
Engine RPM | 7000 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Torque | 133 Nm | 138 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3500 RPM | 2000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 942 kg | 1380 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4150 mm | 4550 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1600 mm | 1680 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1170 mm | 1620 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2210 mm | 2830 mm |