1972 Mazda Cosmo vs. 1960 Nissan Bluebird
To start off, 1972 Mazda Cosmo is newer by 12 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1960 Nissan Bluebird. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1960 Nissan Bluebird would be higher. At 1,964 cc, 1972 Mazda Cosmo is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1972 Mazda Cosmo (93 HP @ 7000 RPM) has 50 more horse power than 1960 Nissan Bluebird. (43 HP @ 4800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1972 Mazda Cosmo should accelerate faster than 1960 Nissan Bluebird. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1972 Mazda Cosmo weights approximately 17 kg more than 1960 Nissan Bluebird. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1972 Mazda Cosmo (133 Nm @ 3500 RPM) has 49 more torque (in Nm) than 1960 Nissan Bluebird. (84 Nm @ 2400 RPM). This means 1972 Mazda Cosmo will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1960 Nissan Bluebird.
Compare all specifications:
| 1972 Mazda Cosmo | 1960 Nissan Bluebird | |
| Make | Mazda | Nissan |
| Model | Cosmo | Bluebird |
| Year Released | 1972 | 1960 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1964 cc | 988 cc |
| Horse Power | 93 HP | 43 HP |
| Engine RPM | 7000 RPM | 4800 RPM |
| Torque | 133 Nm | 84 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3500 RPM | 2400 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Vehicle Weight | 942 kg | 925 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4150 mm | 3870 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1600 mm | 1500 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1170 mm | 1490 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2210 mm | 2290 mm |
