1972 Mazda Cosmo vs. 1963 Pontiac Tempest
To start off, 1972 Mazda Cosmo is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Pontiac Tempest. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Pontiac Tempest would be higher. At 6,376 cc (8 cylinders), 1963 Pontiac Tempest is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1963 Pontiac Tempest (295 HP @ 4900 RPM) has 202 more horse power than 1972 Mazda Cosmo. (93 HP @ 7000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1963 Pontiac Tempest should accelerate faster than 1972 Mazda Cosmo. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1963 Pontiac Tempest weights approximately 468 kg more than 1972 Mazda Cosmo. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Compare all specifications:
| 1972 Mazda Cosmo | 1963 Pontiac Tempest | |
| Make | Mazda | Pontiac |
| Model | Cosmo | Tempest |
| Year Released | 1972 | 1963 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1964 cc | 6376 cc |
| Horse Power | 93 HP | 295 HP |
| Engine RPM | 7000 RPM | 4900 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 942 kg | 1410 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4150 mm | 5160 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1600 mm | 1820 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2210 mm | 2930 mm |
