1972 Mazda Cosmo vs. 1964 Wartburg 312
To start off, 1972 Mazda Cosmo is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Wartburg 312. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Wartburg 312 would be higher. At 1,964 cc, 1972 Mazda Cosmo is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1972 Mazda Cosmo (93 HP @ 7000 RPM) has 57 more horse power than 1964 Wartburg 312. (36 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1972 Mazda Cosmo should accelerate faster than 1964 Wartburg 312. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1964 Wartburg 312 weights approximately 18 kg more than 1972 Mazda Cosmo.
Let's talk about torque, 1972 Mazda Cosmo (133 Nm @ 3500 RPM) has 52 more torque (in Nm) than 1964 Wartburg 312. (81 Nm @ 2200 RPM). This means 1972 Mazda Cosmo will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1964 Wartburg 312.
Compare all specifications:
| 1972 Mazda Cosmo | 1964 Wartburg 312 | |
| Make | Mazda | Wartburg |
| Model | Cosmo | 312 |
| Year Released | 1972 | 1964 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1964 cc | 900 cc |
| Horse Power | 93 HP | 36 HP |
| Engine RPM | 7000 RPM | 4000 RPM |
| Torque | 133 Nm | 81 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3500 RPM | 2200 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 942 kg | 960 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4150 mm | 4310 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1600 mm | 1580 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1170 mm | 1460 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2210 mm | 2460 mm |
