1972 Mazda Cosmo vs. 1968 Mazda 1000
To start off, 1972 Mazda Cosmo is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 Mazda 1000. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 Mazda 1000 would be higher. At 1,964 cc, 1972 Mazda Cosmo is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1972 Mazda Cosmo (93 HP @ 7000 RPM) has 44 more horse power than 1968 Mazda 1000. (49 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1972 Mazda Cosmo should accelerate faster than 1968 Mazda 1000. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1972 Mazda Cosmo weights approximately 232 kg more than 1968 Mazda 1000. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1972 Mazda Cosmo (133 Nm @ 3500 RPM) has 56 more torque (in Nm) than 1968 Mazda 1000. (77 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 1972 Mazda Cosmo will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1968 Mazda 1000.
Compare all specifications:
| 1972 Mazda Cosmo | 1968 Mazda 1000 | |
| Make | Mazda | Mazda |
| Model | Cosmo | 1000 |
| Year Released | 1972 | 1968 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1964 cc | 987 cc |
| Horse Power | 93 HP | 49 HP |
| Engine RPM | 7000 RPM | 6000 RPM |
| Torque | 133 Nm | 77 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3500 RPM | 3500 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 942 kg | 710 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4150 mm | 3800 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1600 mm | 1490 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1170 mm | 1400 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2210 mm | 2270 mm |
