1972 Mazda Cosmo vs. 1973 Reliant Rebel
To start off, 1973 Reliant Rebel is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1972 Mazda Cosmo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1972 Mazda Cosmo would be higher. At 1,964 cc, 1972 Mazda Cosmo is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1972 Mazda Cosmo (93 HP @ 7000 RPM) has 62 more horse power than 1973 Reliant Rebel. (31 HP @ 5000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1972 Mazda Cosmo should accelerate faster than 1973 Reliant Rebel. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1972 Mazda Cosmo weights approximately 367 kg more than 1973 Reliant Rebel. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1972 Mazda Cosmo (133 Nm @ 3500 RPM) has 81 more torque (in Nm) than 1973 Reliant Rebel. (52 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 1972 Mazda Cosmo will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1973 Reliant Rebel.
Compare all specifications:
| 1972 Mazda Cosmo | 1973 Reliant Rebel | |
| Make | Mazda | Reliant |
| Model | Cosmo | Rebel |
| Year Released | 1972 | 1973 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1964 cc | 701 cc |
| Horse Power | 93 HP | 31 HP |
| Engine RPM | 7000 RPM | 5000 RPM |
| Torque | 133 Nm | 52 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3500 RPM | 3000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Vehicle Weight | 942 kg | 575 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4150 mm | 3510 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1600 mm | 1480 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1170 mm | 1420 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2210 mm | 2270 mm |
