1972 Mazda Cosmo vs. 1976 Zastava 132
To start off, 1976 Zastava 132 is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1972 Mazda Cosmo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1972 Mazda Cosmo would be higher. At 1,964 cc, 1972 Mazda Cosmo is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1976 Zastava 132 (106 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 13 more horse power than 1972 Mazda Cosmo. (93 HP @ 7000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1976 Zastava 132 should accelerate faster than 1972 Mazda Cosmo. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1976 Zastava 132 weights approximately 153 kg more than 1972 Mazda Cosmo. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1976 Zastava 132 (142 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 9 more torque (in Nm) than 1972 Mazda Cosmo. (133 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 1976 Zastava 132 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1972 Mazda Cosmo.
Compare all specifications:
1972 Mazda Cosmo | 1976 Zastava 132 | |
Make | Mazda | Zastava |
Model | Cosmo | 132 |
Year Released | 1972 | 1976 |
Engine Size | 1964 cc | 1756 cc |
Horse Power | 93 HP | 106 HP |
Engine RPM | 7000 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 133 Nm | 142 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3500 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Vehicle Weight | 942 kg | 1095 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4150 mm | 4410 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1600 mm | 1650 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1170 mm | 1430 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2210 mm | 2560 mm |