1972 Mazda Cosmo vs. 1977 Rover 2600
To start off, 1977 Rover 2600 is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1972 Mazda Cosmo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1972 Mazda Cosmo would be higher. At 2,596 cc (6 cylinders), 1977 Rover 2600 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1977 Rover 2600 (136 HP @ 5000 RPM) has 43 more horse power than 1972 Mazda Cosmo. (93 HP @ 7000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1977 Rover 2600 should accelerate faster than 1972 Mazda Cosmo. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1977 Rover 2600 weights approximately 406 kg more than 1972 Mazda Cosmo. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1977 Rover 2600 (206 Nm @ 3750 RPM) has 73 more torque (in Nm) than 1972 Mazda Cosmo. (133 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 1977 Rover 2600 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1972 Mazda Cosmo.
Compare all specifications:
1972 Mazda Cosmo | 1977 Rover 2600 | |
Make | Mazda | Rover |
Model | Cosmo | 2600 |
Year Released | 1972 | 1977 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1964 cc | 2596 cc |
Horse Power | 93 HP | 136 HP |
Engine RPM | 7000 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Torque | 133 Nm | 206 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3500 RPM | 3750 RPM |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 942 kg | 1348 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4150 mm | 4710 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1600 mm | 1840 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1170 mm | 1390 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2210 mm | 2820 mm |