1972 Mazda Cosmo vs. 1979 Zastava 2101
To start off, 1979 Zastava 2101 is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1972 Mazda Cosmo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1972 Mazda Cosmo would be higher. At 1,964 cc, 1972 Mazda Cosmo is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1972 Mazda Cosmo (93 HP @ 7000 RPM) has 31 more horse power than 1979 Zastava 2101. (62 HP @ 5600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1972 Mazda Cosmo should accelerate faster than 1979 Zastava 2101. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1979 Zastava 2101 weights approximately 18 kg more than 1972 Mazda Cosmo.
Let's talk about torque, 1972 Mazda Cosmo (133 Nm @ 3500 RPM) has 45 more torque (in Nm) than 1979 Zastava 2101. (88 Nm @ 3400 RPM). This means 1972 Mazda Cosmo will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1979 Zastava 2101.
Compare all specifications:
| 1972 Mazda Cosmo | 1979 Zastava 2101 | |
| Make | Mazda | Zastava |
| Model | Cosmo | 2101 |
| Year Released | 1972 | 1979 |
| Engine Size | 1964 cc | 1198 cc |
| Horse Power | 93 HP | 62 HP |
| Engine RPM | 7000 RPM | 5600 RPM |
| Torque | 133 Nm | 88 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3500 RPM | 3400 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Vehicle Weight | 942 kg | 960 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4150 mm | 4080 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1600 mm | 1620 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1170 mm | 1450 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2210 mm | 2430 mm |
