1972 Mazda Cosmo vs. 1980 Volvo 265
To start off, 1980 Volvo 265 is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1972 Mazda Cosmo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1972 Mazda Cosmo would be higher. At 2,664 cc (6 cylinders), 1980 Volvo 265 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1980 Volvo 265 (148 HP @ 5700 RPM) has 55 more horse power than 1972 Mazda Cosmo. (93 HP @ 7000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1980 Volvo 265 should accelerate faster than 1972 Mazda Cosmo. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1980 Volvo 265 weights approximately 458 kg more than 1972 Mazda Cosmo. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1980 Volvo 265 (219 Nm @ 3000 RPM) has 86 more torque (in Nm) than 1972 Mazda Cosmo. (133 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 1980 Volvo 265 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1972 Mazda Cosmo.
Compare all specifications:
| 1972 Mazda Cosmo | 1980 Volvo 265 | |
| Make | Mazda | Volvo |
| Model | Cosmo | 265 |
| Year Released | 1972 | 1980 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1964 cc | 2664 cc |
| Horse Power | 93 HP | 148 HP |
| Engine RPM | 7000 RPM | 5700 RPM |
| Torque | 133 Nm | 219 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3500 RPM | 3000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 942 kg | 1400 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4150 mm | 4890 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1600 mm | 1720 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1170 mm | 1450 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2210 mm | 2660 mm |
