1972 Mazda Cosmo vs. 1982 Opel Ascona
To start off, 1982 Opel Ascona is newer by 10 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1972 Mazda Cosmo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1972 Mazda Cosmo would be higher. At 1,964 cc, 1972 Mazda Cosmo is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1972 Mazda Cosmo (93 HP @ 7000 RPM) has 34 more horse power than 1982 Opel Ascona. (59 HP @ 5800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1972 Mazda Cosmo should accelerate faster than 1982 Opel Ascona. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1982 Opel Ascona weights approximately 8 kg more than 1972 Mazda Cosmo.
Let's talk about torque, 1972 Mazda Cosmo (133 Nm @ 3500 RPM) has 39 more torque (in Nm) than 1982 Opel Ascona. (94 Nm @ 3400 RPM). This means 1972 Mazda Cosmo will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1982 Opel Ascona.
Compare all specifications:
1972 Mazda Cosmo | 1982 Opel Ascona | |
Make | Mazda | Opel |
Model | Cosmo | Ascona |
Year Released | 1972 | 1982 |
Body Type | Coupe | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1964 cc | 1297 cc |
Horse Power | 93 HP | 59 HP |
Engine RPM | 7000 RPM | 5800 RPM |
Torque | 133 Nm | 94 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3500 RPM | 3400 RPM |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 942 kg | 950 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4150 mm | 4370 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1600 mm | 1670 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1170 mm | 1370 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2210 mm | 2580 mm |