1972 Mazda Cosmo vs. 1982 Opel Corsa
To start off, 1982 Opel Corsa is newer by 10 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1972 Mazda Cosmo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1972 Mazda Cosmo would be higher. At 1,964 cc, 1972 Mazda Cosmo is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1972 Mazda Cosmo (93 HP @ 7000 RPM) has 49 more horse power than 1982 Opel Corsa. (44 HP @ 5400 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1972 Mazda Cosmo should accelerate faster than 1982 Opel Corsa. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1972 Mazda Cosmo weights approximately 202 kg more than 1982 Opel Corsa. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1972 Mazda Cosmo (133 Nm @ 3500 RPM) has 65 more torque (in Nm) than 1982 Opel Corsa. (68 Nm @ 2600 RPM). This means 1972 Mazda Cosmo will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1982 Opel Corsa.
Compare all specifications:
| 1972 Mazda Cosmo | 1982 Opel Corsa | |
| Make | Mazda | Opel |
| Model | Cosmo | Corsa |
| Year Released | 1972 | 1982 |
| Body Type | Coupe | Sedan |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1964 cc | 991 cc |
| Horse Power | 93 HP | 44 HP |
| Engine RPM | 7000 RPM | 5400 RPM |
| Torque | 133 Nm | 68 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3500 RPM | 2600 RPM |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 942 kg | 740 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4150 mm | 3930 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1600 mm | 1550 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1170 mm | 1370 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2210 mm | 2350 mm |
