1972 Mazda Cosmo vs. 1984 Nissan Bluebird
To start off, 1984 Nissan Bluebird is newer by 12 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1972 Mazda Cosmo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1972 Mazda Cosmo would be higher. At 1,964 cc, 1972 Mazda Cosmo is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1984 Nissan Bluebird (94 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 1 more horse power than 1972 Mazda Cosmo. (93 HP @ 7000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1984 Nissan Bluebird should accelerate faster than 1972 Mazda Cosmo. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1984 Nissan Bluebird weights approximately 192 kg more than 1972 Mazda Cosmo. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1984 Nissan Bluebird (152 Nm @ 3200 RPM) has 19 more torque (in Nm) than 1972 Mazda Cosmo. (133 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 1984 Nissan Bluebird will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1972 Mazda Cosmo.
Compare all specifications:
1972 Mazda Cosmo | 1984 Nissan Bluebird | |
Make | Mazda | Nissan |
Model | Cosmo | Bluebird |
Year Released | 1972 | 1984 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1964 cc | 1952 cc |
Horse Power | 93 HP | 94 HP |
Engine RPM | 7000 RPM | 5600 RPM |
Torque | 133 Nm | 152 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3500 RPM | 3200 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Vehicle Weight | 942 kg | 1134 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4150 mm | 4430 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1600 mm | 1660 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1170 mm | 1400 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2210 mm | 2530 mm |