1972 Mazda Cosmo vs. 1989 Volvo 740
To start off, 1989 Volvo 740 is newer by 17 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1972 Mazda Cosmo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1972 Mazda Cosmo would be higher. At 1,986 cc (4 cylinders), 1989 Volvo 740 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1989 Volvo 740 (116 HP @ 5700 RPM) has 23 more horse power than 1972 Mazda Cosmo. (93 HP @ 7000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1989 Volvo 740 should accelerate faster than 1972 Mazda Cosmo. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1989 Volvo 740 weights approximately 318 kg more than 1972 Mazda Cosmo. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1989 Volvo 740 (194 Nm @ 2500 RPM) has 61 more torque (in Nm) than 1972 Mazda Cosmo. (133 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 1989 Volvo 740 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1972 Mazda Cosmo.
Compare all specifications:
1972 Mazda Cosmo | 1989 Volvo 740 | |
Make | Mazda | Volvo |
Model | Cosmo | 740 |
Year Released | 1972 | 1989 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1964 cc | 1986 cc |
Horse Power | 93 HP | 116 HP |
Engine RPM | 7000 RPM | 5700 RPM |
Torque | 133 Nm | 194 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3500 RPM | 2500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 942 kg | 1260 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4150 mm | 4790 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1600 mm | 1760 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1170 mm | 1420 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2210 mm | 2780 mm |