1972 Mazda Cosmo vs. 1996 Toyota Lexcen
To start off, 1996 Toyota Lexcen is newer by 24 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1972 Mazda Cosmo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1972 Mazda Cosmo would be higher. At 3,791 cc (6 cylinders), 1996 Toyota Lexcen is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1996 Toyota Lexcen (194 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 101 more horse power than 1972 Mazda Cosmo. (93 HP @ 7000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1996 Toyota Lexcen should accelerate faster than 1972 Mazda Cosmo. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1996 Toyota Lexcen weights approximately 443 kg more than 1972 Mazda Cosmo. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1996 Toyota Lexcen (304 Nm @ 3600 RPM) has 171 more torque (in Nm) than 1972 Mazda Cosmo. (133 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 1996 Toyota Lexcen will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1972 Mazda Cosmo.
Compare all specifications:
1972 Mazda Cosmo | 1996 Toyota Lexcen | |
Make | Mazda | Toyota |
Model | Cosmo | Lexcen |
Year Released | 1972 | 1996 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1964 cc | 3791 cc |
Horse Power | 93 HP | 194 HP |
Engine RPM | 7000 RPM | 5200 RPM |
Torque | 133 Nm | 304 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3500 RPM | 3600 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 942 kg | 1385 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4150 mm | 4870 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1600 mm | 1800 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1170 mm | 1450 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2210 mm | 2740 mm |