1972 Mazda Cosmo vs. 1997 Skoda Octavia
To start off, 1997 Skoda Octavia is newer by 25 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1972 Mazda Cosmo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1972 Mazda Cosmo would be higher. At 1,964 cc, 1972 Mazda Cosmo is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1997 Skoda Octavia (123 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 30 more horse power than 1972 Mazda Cosmo. (93 HP @ 7000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1997 Skoda Octavia should accelerate faster than 1972 Mazda Cosmo. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1997 Skoda Octavia weights approximately 323 kg more than 1972 Mazda Cosmo. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1997 Skoda Octavia (173 Nm @ 4100 RPM) has 40 more torque (in Nm) than 1972 Mazda Cosmo. (133 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 1997 Skoda Octavia will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1972 Mazda Cosmo.
Compare all specifications:
| 1972 Mazda Cosmo | 1997 Skoda Octavia | |
| Make | Mazda | Skoda |
| Model | Cosmo | Octavia |
| Year Released | 1972 | 1997 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1964 cc | 1781 cc |
| Horse Power | 93 HP | 123 HP |
| Engine RPM | 7000 RPM | 6000 RPM |
| Torque | 133 Nm | 173 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3500 RPM | 4100 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Vehicle Weight | 942 kg | 1265 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4150 mm | 4520 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1600 mm | 1740 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1170 mm | 1440 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2210 mm | 2520 mm |
