1972 Mazda Cosmo vs. 2000 Peugeot 607
To start off, 2000 Peugeot 607 is newer by 28 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1972 Mazda Cosmo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1972 Mazda Cosmo would be higher. At 2,230 cc (4 cylinders), 2000 Peugeot 607 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Peugeot 607 (134 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 41 more horse power than 1972 Mazda Cosmo. (93 HP @ 7000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2000 Peugeot 607 should accelerate faster than 1972 Mazda Cosmo. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Peugeot 607 weights approximately 593 kg more than 1972 Mazda Cosmo. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2000 Peugeot 607 (315 Nm @ 2000 RPM) has 182 more torque (in Nm) than 1972 Mazda Cosmo. (133 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 2000 Peugeot 607 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1972 Mazda Cosmo.
Compare all specifications:
1972 Mazda Cosmo | 2000 Peugeot 607 | |
Make | Mazda | Peugeot |
Model | Cosmo | 607 |
Year Released | 1972 | 2000 |
Body Type | Coupe | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1964 cc | 2230 cc |
Horse Power | 93 HP | 134 HP |
Engine RPM | 7000 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Torque | 133 Nm | 315 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3500 RPM | 2000 RPM |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 942 kg | 1535 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4150 mm | 4880 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1600 mm | 1840 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1170 mm | 1470 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2210 mm | 2810 mm |