1972 Mazda Cosmo vs. 2003 Mercedes-Benz Viano
To start off, 2003 Mercedes-Benz Viano is newer by 31 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1972 Mazda Cosmo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1972 Mazda Cosmo would be higher. At 3,199 cc (6 cylinders), 2003 Mercedes-Benz Viano is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Mercedes-Benz Viano (187 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 94 more horse power than 1972 Mazda Cosmo. (93 HP @ 7000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2003 Mercedes-Benz Viano should accelerate faster than 1972 Mazda Cosmo. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Mercedes-Benz Viano weights approximately 1143 kg more than 1972 Mazda Cosmo. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2003 Mercedes-Benz Viano (180 Nm @ 2750 RPM) has 47 more torque (in Nm) than 1972 Mazda Cosmo. (133 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 2003 Mercedes-Benz Viano will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1972 Mazda Cosmo.
Compare all specifications:
1972 Mazda Cosmo | 2003 Mercedes-Benz Viano | |
Make | Mazda | Mercedes-Benz |
Model | Cosmo | Viano |
Year Released | 1972 | 2003 |
Body Type | Coupe | Minivan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1964 cc | 3199 cc |
Horse Power | 93 HP | 187 HP |
Engine RPM | 7000 RPM | 5600 RPM |
Torque | 133 Nm | 180 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3500 RPM | 2750 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline - Premium |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 942 kg | 2085 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4150 mm | 5000 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1600 mm | 1910 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1170 mm | 1880 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2210 mm | 2720 mm |