1972 Mazda Cosmo vs. 2003 Mitsubishi Pajero
To start off, 2003 Mitsubishi Pajero is newer by 31 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1972 Mazda Cosmo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1972 Mazda Cosmo would be higher. At 2,376 cc (4 cylinders), 2003 Mitsubishi Pajero is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Mitsubishi Pajero (113 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 20 more horse power than 1972 Mazda Cosmo. (93 HP @ 7000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2003 Mitsubishi Pajero should accelerate faster than 1972 Mazda Cosmo. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Mitsubishi Pajero weights approximately 966 kg more than 1972 Mazda Cosmo. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2003 Mitsubishi Pajero (240 Nm @ 2000 RPM) has 107 more torque (in Nm) than 1972 Mazda Cosmo. (133 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 2003 Mitsubishi Pajero will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1972 Mazda Cosmo.
Compare all specifications:
1972 Mazda Cosmo | 2003 Mitsubishi Pajero | |
Make | Mazda | Mitsubishi |
Model | Cosmo | Pajero |
Year Released | 1972 | 2003 |
Body Type | Coupe | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1964 cc | 2376 cc |
Horse Power | 93 HP | 113 HP |
Engine RPM | 7000 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Torque | 133 Nm | 240 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3500 RPM | 2000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 942 kg | 1908 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4150 mm | 4550 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1600 mm | 1780 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1170 mm | 1740 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2210 mm | 2730 mm |