1972 Mazda Cosmo vs. 2004 Mazda 3
To start off, 2004 Mazda 3 is newer by 32 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1972 Mazda Cosmo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1972 Mazda Cosmo would be higher. At 1,964 cc, 1972 Mazda Cosmo is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Mazda 3 (104 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 11 more horse power than 1972 Mazda Cosmo. (93 HP @ 7000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Mazda 3 should accelerate faster than 1972 Mazda Cosmo. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Mazda 3 weights approximately 198 kg more than 1972 Mazda Cosmo. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2004 Mazda 3 (148 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 15 more torque (in Nm) than 1972 Mazda Cosmo. (133 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 2004 Mazda 3 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1972 Mazda Cosmo.
Compare all specifications:
| 1972 Mazda Cosmo | 2004 Mazda 3 | |
| Make | Mazda | Mazda |
| Model | Cosmo | 3 |
| Year Released | 1972 | 2004 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1964 cc | 1596 cc |
| Horse Power | 93 HP | 104 HP |
| Engine RPM | 7000 RPM | 4000 RPM |
| Torque | 133 Nm | 148 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3500 RPM | 4000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 3 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 942 kg | 1140 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4150 mm | 4430 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1600 mm | 1760 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1170 mm | 1470 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2210 mm | 2650 mm |
