1972 Mazda Cosmo vs. 2005 Opel Omega
To start off, 2005 Opel Omega is newer by 33 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1972 Mazda Cosmo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1972 Mazda Cosmo would be higher. At 2,198 cc (4 cylinders), 2005 Opel Omega is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Opel Omega (142 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 49 more horse power than 1972 Mazda Cosmo. (93 HP @ 7000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2005 Opel Omega should accelerate faster than 1972 Mazda Cosmo. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Opel Omega weights approximately 672 kg more than 1972 Mazda Cosmo. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2005 Opel Omega (203 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 70 more torque (in Nm) than 1972 Mazda Cosmo. (133 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 2005 Opel Omega will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1972 Mazda Cosmo.
Compare all specifications:
1972 Mazda Cosmo | 2005 Opel Omega | |
Make | Mazda | Opel |
Model | Cosmo | Omega |
Year Released | 1972 | 2005 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1964 cc | 2198 cc |
Horse Power | 93 HP | 142 HP |
Engine RPM | 7000 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Torque | 133 Nm | 203 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3500 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 942 kg | 1614 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4150 mm | 4900 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1600 mm | 1780 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1170 mm | 1460 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2210 mm | 2720 mm |