1972 Mazda Cosmo vs. 2007 Volvo XC90
To start off, 2007 Volvo XC90 is newer by 35 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1972 Mazda Cosmo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1972 Mazda Cosmo would be higher. At 3,201 cc (6 cylinders), 2007 Volvo XC90 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2007 Volvo XC90 (235 HP @ 6200 RPM) has 142 more horse power than 1972 Mazda Cosmo. (93 HP @ 7000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2007 Volvo XC90 should accelerate faster than 1972 Mazda Cosmo. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2007 Volvo XC90 weights approximately 1044 kg more than 1972 Mazda Cosmo. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2007 Volvo XC90 (320 Nm @ 6200 RPM) has 187 more torque (in Nm) than 1972 Mazda Cosmo. (133 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 2007 Volvo XC90 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1972 Mazda Cosmo.
Compare all specifications:
| 1972 Mazda Cosmo | 2007 Volvo XC90 | |
| Make | Mazda | Volvo |
| Model | Cosmo | XC90 |
| Year Released | 1972 | 2007 |
| Body Type | Coupe | SUV |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1964 cc | 3201 cc |
| Horse Power | 93 HP | 235 HP |
| Engine RPM | 7000 RPM | 6200 RPM |
| Torque | 133 Nm | 320 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3500 RPM | 6200 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline - Premium |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 942 kg | 1986 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4150 mm | 4810 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1600 mm | 1910 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1170 mm | 1750 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2210 mm | 2870 mm |
