1972 Mazda Cosmo vs. 2009 Mercury Mountaineer
To start off, 2009 Mercury Mountaineer is newer by 37 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1972 Mazda Cosmo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1972 Mazda Cosmo would be higher. At 4,606 cc (8 cylinders), 2009 Mercury Mountaineer is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Mercury Mountaineer (292 HP @ 5700 RPM) has 199 more horse power than 1972 Mazda Cosmo. (93 HP @ 7000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Mercury Mountaineer should accelerate faster than 1972 Mazda Cosmo.
Let's talk about torque, 2009 Mercury Mountaineer (427 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 294 more torque (in Nm) than 1972 Mazda Cosmo. (133 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 2009 Mercury Mountaineer will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1972 Mazda Cosmo.
Compare all specifications:
1972 Mazda Cosmo | 2009 Mercury Mountaineer | |
Make | Mazda | Mercury |
Model | Cosmo | Mountaineer |
Year Released | 1972 | 2009 |
Body Type | Coupe | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1964 cc | 4606 cc |
Horse Power | 93 HP | 292 HP |
Engine RPM | 7000 RPM | 5700 RPM |
Torque | 133 Nm | 427 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3500 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 7 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4150 mm | 4920 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1600 mm | 1880 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1170 mm | 1860 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2210 mm | 2890 mm |