1972 Mazda Cosmo vs. 2009 Nissan Pathfinder
To start off, 2009 Nissan Pathfinder is newer by 37 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1972 Mazda Cosmo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1972 Mazda Cosmo would be higher. At 3,954 cc (6 cylinders), 2009 Nissan Pathfinder is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Nissan Pathfinder (266 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 173 more horse power than 1972 Mazda Cosmo. (93 HP @ 7000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Nissan Pathfinder should accelerate faster than 1972 Mazda Cosmo. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Nissan Pathfinder weights approximately 500 kg more than 1972 Mazda Cosmo. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2009 Nissan Pathfinder (391 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 258 more torque (in Nm) than 1972 Mazda Cosmo. (133 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 2009 Nissan Pathfinder will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1972 Mazda Cosmo.
Compare all specifications:
1972 Mazda Cosmo | 2009 Nissan Pathfinder | |
Make | Mazda | Nissan |
Model | Cosmo | Pathfinder |
Year Released | 1972 | 2009 |
Body Type | Coupe | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1964 cc | 3954 cc |
Horse Power | 93 HP | 266 HP |
Engine RPM | 7000 RPM | 5600 RPM |
Torque | 133 Nm | 391 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3500 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 7 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 942 kg | 1442 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4150 mm | 4900 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1600 mm | 1860 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1170 mm | 1840 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2210 mm | 2860 mm |