1972 Mazda Cosmo vs. 2011 Volvo C30
To start off, 2011 Volvo C30 is newer by 39 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1972 Mazda Cosmo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1972 Mazda Cosmo would be higher. At 1,964 cc, 1972 Mazda Cosmo is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2011 Volvo C30 (114 HP) has 21 more horse power than 1972 Mazda Cosmo. (93 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2011 Volvo C30 should accelerate faster than 1972 Mazda Cosmo. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2011 Volvo C30 weights approximately 509 kg more than 1972 Mazda Cosmo. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2011 Volvo C30 (270 Nm) has 137 more torque (in Nm) than 1972 Mazda Cosmo. (133 Nm). This means 2011 Volvo C30 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1972 Mazda Cosmo.
Compare all specifications:
1972 Mazda Cosmo | 2011 Volvo C30 | |
Make | Mazda | Volvo |
Model | Cosmo | C30 |
Year Released | 1972 | 2011 |
Body Type | Coupe | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1964 cc | 1600 cc |
Horse Power | 93 HP | 114 HP |
Torque | 133 Nm | 270 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 3 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 942 kg | 1451 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4150 mm | 4252 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1600 mm | 1783 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1170 mm | 1448 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2210 mm | 2639 mm |