1972 Mazda Cosmo vs. 2013 Ford E-Series
To start off, 2013 Ford E-Series is newer by 41 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1972 Mazda Cosmo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1972 Mazda Cosmo would be higher. At 5,400 cc (8 cylinders), 2013 Ford E-Series is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 Ford E-Series (252 HP @ 4500 RPM) has 159 more horse power than 1972 Mazda Cosmo. (93 HP @ 7000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Ford E-Series should accelerate faster than 1972 Mazda Cosmo. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Ford E-Series weights approximately 703 kg more than 1972 Mazda Cosmo. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2013 Ford E-Series (387 Nm @ 2500 RPM) has 254 more torque (in Nm) than 1972 Mazda Cosmo. (133 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 2013 Ford E-Series will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1972 Mazda Cosmo.
Compare all specifications:
1972 Mazda Cosmo | 2013 Ford E-Series | |
Make | Mazda | Ford |
Model | Cosmo | E-Series |
Year Released | 1972 | 2013 |
Body Type | Coupe | Van |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1964 cc | 5400 cc |
Horse Power | 93 HP | 252 HP |
Engine RPM | 7000 RPM | 4500 RPM |
Torque | 133 Nm | 387 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3500 RPM | 2500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Flex Fuel |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 25 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 3 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 942 kg | 1645 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4150 mm | 5504 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1600 mm | 2017 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1170 mm | 2111 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2210 mm | 3505 mm |