1972 Mazda Luce vs. 2004 Toyota Tundra
To start off, 2004 Toyota Tundra is newer by 32 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1972 Mazda Luce. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1972 Mazda Luce would be higher. At 3,400 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Toyota Tundra is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Toyota Tundra (187 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 117 more horse power than 1972 Mazda Luce. (70 HP @ 5500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Toyota Tundra should accelerate faster than 1972 Mazda Luce. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Toyota Tundra weights approximately 570 kg more than 1972 Mazda Luce. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2004 Toyota Tundra (298 Nm @ 3600 RPM) has 180 more torque (in Nm) than 1972 Mazda Luce. (118 Nm @ 2800 RPM). This means 2004 Toyota Tundra will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1972 Mazda Luce.
Compare all specifications:
1972 Mazda Luce | 2004 Toyota Tundra | |
Make | Mazda | Toyota |
Model | Luce | Tundra |
Year Released | 1972 | 2004 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1490 cc | 3400 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 70 HP | 187 HP |
Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 4800 RPM |
Torque | 118 Nm | 298 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2800 RPM | 3600 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1150 kg | 1720 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4380 mm | 5530 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1640 mm | 1920 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1440 mm | 1800 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2510 mm | 3270 mm |