1972 Mazda RX-2 vs. 1949 Volvo PV 60
To start off, 1972 Mazda RX-2 is newer by 23 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1949 Volvo PV 60. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1949 Volvo PV 60 would be higher. At 3,670 cc (6 cylinders), 1949 Volvo PV 60 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1972 Mazda RX-2 (118 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 33 more horse power than 1949 Volvo PV 60. (85 HP @ 3400 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1972 Mazda RX-2 should accelerate faster than 1949 Volvo PV 60. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1949 Volvo PV 60 weights approximately 670 kg more than 1972 Mazda RX-2.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1972 Mazda RX-2 | 1949 Volvo PV 60 | |
| Make | Mazda | Volvo |
| Model | RX-2 | PV 60 |
| Year Released | 1972 | 1949 |
| Engine Size | 2292 cc | 3670 cc |
| Engine Type | dual-disk rotary | in-line |
| Horse Power | 118 HP | 85 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6500 RPM | 3400 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 960 kg | 1630 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 2480 mm | 2850 mm |
