1972 Mazda RX-2 vs. 1955 Rover P4
To start off, 1972 Mazda RX-2 is newer by 17 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1955 Rover P4. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1955 Rover P4 would be higher. At 2,292 cc, 1972 Mazda RX-2 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1972 Mazda RX-2 (118 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 44 more horse power than 1955 Rover P4. (74 HP @ 4200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1972 Mazda RX-2 should accelerate faster than 1955 Rover P4. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1955 Rover P4 weights approximately 430 kg more than 1972 Mazda RX-2.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1972 Mazda RX-2 (157 Nm) has 7 more torque (in Nm) than 1955 Rover P4. (150 Nm). This means 1972 Mazda RX-2 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1955 Rover P4.
Compare all specifications:
1972 Mazda RX-2 | 1955 Rover P4 | |
Make | Mazda | Rover |
Model | RX-2 | P4 |
Year Released | 1972 | 1955 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2292 cc | 2102 cc |
Engine Type | dual-disk rotary | in-line |
Horse Power | 118 HP | 74 HP |
Engine RPM | 6500 RPM | 4200 RPM |
Torque | 157 Nm | 150 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 960 kg | 1390 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4160 mm | 4590 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1590 mm | 1670 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1400 mm | 1620 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2480 mm | 2830 mm |