1972 Mazda RX-2 vs. 1969 Oldsmobile Cutlass
To start off, 1972 Mazda RX-2 is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1969 Oldsmobile Cutlass. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1969 Oldsmobile Cutlass would be higher. At 7,446 cc (8 cylinders), 1969 Oldsmobile Cutlass is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1969 Oldsmobile Cutlass weights approximately 820 kg more than 1972 Mazda RX-2.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1972 Mazda RX-2 | 1969 Oldsmobile Cutlass | |
Make | Mazda | Oldsmobile |
Model | RX-2 | Cutlass |
Year Released | 1972 | 1969 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2292 cc | 7446 cc |
Engine Type | dual-disk rotary | in-line |
Horse Power | 118 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 960 kg | 1780 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4160 mm | 5280 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1590 mm | 1960 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1400 mm | 1370 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2480 mm | 2960 mm |