1972 Mazda RX-2 vs. 1979 Pontiac Trans Am
To start off, 1979 Pontiac Trans Am is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1972 Mazda RX-2. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1972 Mazda RX-2 would be higher. At 6,555 cc (8 cylinders), 1979 Pontiac Trans Am is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1979 Pontiac Trans Am (220 HP) has 102 more horse power than 1972 Mazda RX-2. (118 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1979 Pontiac Trans Am should accelerate faster than 1972 Mazda RX-2.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1979 Pontiac Trans Am (434 Nm) has 277 more torque (in Nm) than 1972 Mazda RX-2. (157 Nm). This means 1979 Pontiac Trans Am will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1972 Mazda RX-2.
Compare all specifications:
1972 Mazda RX-2 | 1979 Pontiac Trans Am | |
Make | Mazda | Pontiac |
Model | RX-2 | Trans Am |
Year Released | 1972 | 1979 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2292 cc | 6555 cc |
Engine Type | dual-disk rotary | V |
Horse Power | 118 HP | 220 HP |
Torque | 157 Nm | 434 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Vehicle Length | 4160 mm | 5040 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1590 mm | 1860 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1400 mm | 1260 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2480 mm | 2750 mm |