1972 Mazda RX-2 vs. 1981 Seat 131
To start off, 1981 Seat 131 is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1972 Mazda RX-2. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1972 Mazda RX-2 would be higher. At 2,292 cc, 1972 Mazda RX-2 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1972 Mazda RX-2 (118 HP) has 65 more horse power than 1981 Seat 131. (53 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1972 Mazda RX-2 should accelerate faster than 1981 Seat 131. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1981 Seat 131 weights approximately 5 kg more than 1972 Mazda RX-2.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1972 Mazda RX-2 (157 Nm @ 3500 RPM) has 63 more torque (in Nm) than 1981 Seat 131. (94 Nm @ 2700 RPM). This means 1972 Mazda RX-2 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1981 Seat 131.
Compare all specifications:
1972 Mazda RX-2 | 1981 Seat 131 | |
Make | Mazda | Seat |
Model | RX-2 | 131 |
Year Released | 1972 | 1981 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2292 cc | 1297 cc |
Engine Type | dual-disk rotary | in-line |
Horse Power | 118 HP | 53 HP |
Torque | 157 Nm | 94 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3500 RPM | 2700 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 960 kg | 965 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4160 mm | 4270 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1590 mm | 1660 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1400 mm | 1370 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2480 mm | 2500 mm |