1972 Mazda RX-2 vs. 1989 Volvo 244
To start off, 1989 Volvo 244 is newer by 17 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1972 Mazda RX-2. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1972 Mazda RX-2 would be higher. At 2,292 cc, 1972 Mazda RX-2 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1972 Mazda RX-2 (118 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 22 more horse power than 1989 Volvo 244. (96 HP @ 5400 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1972 Mazda RX-2 should accelerate faster than 1989 Volvo 244. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1989 Volvo 244 weights approximately 336 kg more than 1972 Mazda RX-2.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, both vehicles can yield 157 Nm of torque. So under normal driving conditions, the ability to climb up hills and pull heavy equipment should be relatively similar for both vehicles.
Compare all specifications:
1972 Mazda RX-2 | 1989 Volvo 244 | |
Make | Mazda | Volvo |
Model | RX-2 | 244 |
Year Released | 1972 | 1989 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2292 cc | 1986 cc |
Engine Type | dual-disk rotary | in-line |
Horse Power | 118 HP | 96 HP |
Engine RPM | 6500 RPM | 5400 RPM |
Torque | 157 Nm | 157 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3500 RPM | 3200 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 960 kg | 1296 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4160 mm | 4790 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1590 mm | 1730 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1400 mm | 1440 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2480 mm | 2660 mm |