1972 Mazda RX-2 vs. 1990 Buick Century
To start off, 1990 Buick Century is newer by 18 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1972 Mazda RX-2. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1972 Mazda RX-2 would be higher. At 3,300 cc (6 cylinders), 1990 Buick Century is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1990 Buick Century (161 HP) has 43 more horse power than 1972 Mazda RX-2. (118 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1990 Buick Century should accelerate faster than 1972 Mazda RX-2.
Because 1972 Mazda RX-2 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1972 Mazda RX-2. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1990 Buick Century, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1990 Buick Century (251 Nm) has 94 more torque (in Nm) than 1972 Mazda RX-2. (157 Nm). This means 1990 Buick Century will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1972 Mazda RX-2.
Compare all specifications:
| 1972 Mazda RX-2 | 1990 Buick Century | |
| Make | Mazda | Buick |
| Model | RX-2 | Century |
| Year Released | 1972 | 1990 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2292 cc | 3300 cc |
| Engine Type | dual-disk rotary | V |
| Horse Power | 118 HP | 161 HP |
| Torque | 157 Nm | 251 Nm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Length | 4160 mm | 4849 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1590 mm | 1763 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1400 mm | 1374 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2480 mm | 2664 mm |
