1972 Mazda RX-2 vs. 1991 Opel Astra
To start off, 1991 Opel Astra is newer by 19 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1972 Mazda RX-2. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1972 Mazda RX-2 would be higher. At 2,292 cc, 1972 Mazda RX-2 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1972 Mazda RX-2 (118 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 59 more horse power than 1991 Opel Astra. (59 HP @ 5200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1972 Mazda RX-2 should accelerate faster than 1991 Opel Astra.
Because 1972 Mazda RX-2 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1972 Mazda RX-2. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1991 Opel Astra, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1972 Mazda RX-2 (157 Nm @ 3500 RPM) has 53 more torque (in Nm) than 1991 Opel Astra. (104 Nm @ 2800 RPM). This means 1972 Mazda RX-2 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1991 Opel Astra.
Compare all specifications:
1972 Mazda RX-2 | 1991 Opel Astra | |
Make | Mazda | Opel |
Model | RX-2 | Astra |
Year Released | 1972 | 1991 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2292 cc | 1389 cc |
Engine Type | dual-disk rotary | in-line |
Horse Power | 118 HP | 59 HP |
Engine RPM | 6500 RPM | 5200 RPM |
Torque | 157 Nm | 104 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3500 RPM | 2800 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 960 kg | 960 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4160 mm | 4250 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1590 mm | 1690 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1400 mm | 1430 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2480 mm | 2610 mm |