1972 Mazda RX-2 vs. 1994 Rover 400
To start off, 1994 Rover 400 is newer by 22 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1972 Mazda RX-2. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1972 Mazda RX-2 would be higher. At 2,292 cc, 1972 Mazda RX-2 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1972 Mazda RX-2 (118 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 9 more horse power than 1994 Rover 400. (109 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1972 Mazda RX-2 should accelerate faster than 1994 Rover 400.
Because 1972 Mazda RX-2 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1972 Mazda RX-2. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1994 Rover 400, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1972 Mazda RX-2 (157 Nm @ 3500 RPM) has 12 more torque (in Nm) than 1994 Rover 400. (145 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 1972 Mazda RX-2 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1994 Rover 400.
Compare all specifications:
1972 Mazda RX-2 | 1994 Rover 400 | |
Make | Mazda | Rover |
Model | RX-2 | 400 |
Year Released | 1972 | 1994 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2292 cc | 1590 cc |
Engine Type | dual-disk rotary | in-line |
Horse Power | 118 HP | 109 HP |
Engine RPM | 6500 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 157 Nm | 145 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3500 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Length | 4160 mm | 4370 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1590 mm | 1690 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1400 mm | 1410 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2480 mm | 2560 mm |