1972 Mazda RX-2 vs. 1996 Mercury Cougar
To start off, 1996 Mercury Cougar is newer by 24 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1972 Mazda RX-2. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1972 Mazda RX-2 would be higher. At 3,798 cc (8 cylinders), 1996 Mercury Cougar is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1996 Mercury Cougar weights approximately 660 kg more than 1972 Mazda RX-2.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1972 Mazda RX-2 | 1996 Mercury Cougar | |
| Make | Mazda | Mercury |
| Model | RX-2 | Cougar |
| Year Released | 1972 | 1996 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2292 cc | 3798 cc |
| Engine Type | dual-disk rotary | in-line |
| Horse Power | 118 HP | 0 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 960 kg | 1620 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4160 mm | 5090 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1590 mm | 1860 mm |
