1972 Mazda RX-2 vs. 1996 Subaru Outback
To start off, 1996 Subaru Outback is newer by 24 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1972 Mazda RX-2. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1972 Mazda RX-2 would be higher. At 2,501 cc (4 cylinders), 1996 Subaru Outback is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1996 Subaru Outback (165 HP) has 47 more horse power than 1972 Mazda RX-2. (118 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1996 Subaru Outback should accelerate faster than 1972 Mazda RX-2.
Because 1996 Subaru Outback is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1972 Mazda RX-2. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1996 Subaru Outback will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1996 Subaru Outback (221 Nm) has 64 more torque (in Nm) than 1972 Mazda RX-2. (157 Nm). This means 1996 Subaru Outback will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1972 Mazda RX-2.
Compare all specifications:
| 1972 Mazda RX-2 | 1996 Subaru Outback | |
| Make | Mazda | Subaru |
| Model | RX-2 | Outback |
| Year Released | 1972 | 1996 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2292 cc | 2501 cc |
| Engine Type | dual-disk rotary | boxer |
| Horse Power | 118 HP | 165 HP |
| Torque | 157 Nm | 221 Nm |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Length | 4160 mm | 4380 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1590 mm | 1710 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1400 mm | 1510 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2480 mm | 2530 mm |
