1972 Mazda RX-2 vs. 1997 Acura CL
To start off, 1997 Acura CL is newer by 25 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1972 Mazda RX-2. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1972 Mazda RX-2 would be higher. At 2,292 cc, 1972 Mazda RX-2 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1997 Acura CL (145 HP) has 27 more horse power than 1972 Mazda RX-2. (118 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1997 Acura CL should accelerate faster than 1972 Mazda RX-2. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1997 Acura CL weights approximately 620 kg more than 1972 Mazda RX-2. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1972 Mazda RX-2 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1972 Mazda RX-2. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1997 Acura CL, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1972 Mazda RX-2 | 1997 Acura CL | |
Make | Mazda | Acura |
Model | RX-2 | CL |
Year Released | 1972 | 1997 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2292 cc | 2200 cc |
Engine Type | dual-disk rotary | in-line |
Horse Power | 118 HP | 145 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 960 kg | 1580 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4160 mm | 4826 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1590 mm | 1781 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1400 mm | 1389 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2480 mm | 2715 mm |