1972 Mazda RX-2 vs. 1997 Oldsmobile Aurora
To start off, 1997 Oldsmobile Aurora is newer by 25 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1972 Mazda RX-2. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1972 Mazda RX-2 would be higher. At 3,995 cc (8 cylinders), 1997 Oldsmobile Aurora is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1997 Oldsmobile Aurora weights approximately 809 kg more than 1972 Mazda RX-2.
Because 1972 Mazda RX-2 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1972 Mazda RX-2. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1997 Oldsmobile Aurora, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1997 Oldsmobile Aurora (353 Nm) has 196 more torque (in Nm) than 1972 Mazda RX-2. (157 Nm). This means 1997 Oldsmobile Aurora will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1972 Mazda RX-2.
Compare all specifications:
| 1972 Mazda RX-2 | 1997 Oldsmobile Aurora | |
| Make | Mazda | Oldsmobile |
| Model | RX-2 | Aurora |
| Year Released | 1972 | 1997 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2292 cc | 3995 cc |
| Engine Type | dual-disk rotary | V |
| Horse Power | 118 HP | 0 HP |
| Torque | 157 Nm | 353 Nm |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 960 kg | 1769 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4160 mm | 5220 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1590 mm | 1900 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1400 mm | 1410 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2480 mm | 2900 mm |
