1972 Mazda RX-2 vs. 2003 Nissan X-Trail
To start off, 2003 Nissan X-Trail is newer by 31 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1972 Mazda RX-2. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1972 Mazda RX-2 would be higher. At 2,292 cc, 1972 Mazda RX-2 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1972 Mazda RX-2 (118 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 6 more horse power than 2003 Nissan X-Trail. (112 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1972 Mazda RX-2 should accelerate faster than 2003 Nissan X-Trail. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Nissan X-Trail weights approximately 640 kg more than 1972 Mazda RX-2.
Because 2003 Nissan X-Trail is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1972 Mazda RX-2. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 Nissan X-Trail will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2003 Nissan X-Trail (270 Nm @ 2000 RPM) has 113 more torque (in Nm) than 1972 Mazda RX-2. (157 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 2003 Nissan X-Trail will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1972 Mazda RX-2.
Compare all specifications:
1972 Mazda RX-2 | 2003 Nissan X-Trail | |
Make | Mazda | Nissan |
Model | RX-2 | X-Trail |
Year Released | 1972 | 2003 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2292 cc | 2184 cc |
Engine Type | dual-disk rotary | in-line |
Horse Power | 118 HP | 112 HP |
Engine RPM | 6500 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Torque | 157 Nm | 270 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3500 RPM | 2000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 960 kg | 1600 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4160 mm | 4520 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1590 mm | 1770 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1400 mm | 1760 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2480 mm | 2540 mm |