1972 Mazda RX-2 vs. 2008 Opel Omega
To start off, 2008 Opel Omega is newer by 36 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1972 Mazda RX-2. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1972 Mazda RX-2 would be higher. At 2,597 cc (6 cylinders), 2008 Opel Omega is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2008 Opel Omega (177 HP @ 3400 RPM) has 59 more horse power than 1972 Mazda RX-2. (118 HP @ 6500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2008 Opel Omega should accelerate faster than 1972 Mazda RX-2. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2008 Opel Omega weights approximately 725 kg more than 1972 Mazda RX-2. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2008 Opel Omega (241 Nm @ 3400 RPM) has 84 more torque (in Nm) than 1972 Mazda RX-2. (157 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 2008 Opel Omega will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1972 Mazda RX-2.
Compare all specifications:
| 1972 Mazda RX-2 | 2008 Opel Omega | |
| Make | Mazda | Opel |
| Model | RX-2 | Omega |
| Year Released | 1972 | 2008 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2292 cc | 2597 cc |
| Engine Type | dual-disk rotary | V |
| Horse Power | 118 HP | 177 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6500 RPM | 3400 RPM |
| Torque | 157 Nm | 241 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3500 RPM | 3400 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 960 kg | 1685 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 2480 mm | 2740 mm |
