1972 Mazda RX-2 vs. 2010 Holden Epica
To start off, 2010 Holden Epica is newer by 38 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1972 Mazda RX-2. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1972 Mazda RX-2 would be higher. At 2,292 cc, 1972 Mazda RX-2 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Holden Epica (148 HP) has 30 more horse power than 1972 Mazda RX-2. (118 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Holden Epica should accelerate faster than 1972 Mazda RX-2.
Because 1972 Mazda RX-2 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1972 Mazda RX-2. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Holden Epica, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2010 Holden Epica (320 Nm) has 163 more torque (in Nm) than 1972 Mazda RX-2. (157 Nm). This means 2010 Holden Epica will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1972 Mazda RX-2.
Compare all specifications:
1972 Mazda RX-2 | 2010 Holden Epica | |
Make | Mazda | Holden |
Model | RX-2 | Epica |
Year Released | 1972 | 2010 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2292 cc | 1991 cc |
Engine Type | dual-disk rotary | in-line |
Horse Power | 118 HP | 148 HP |
Torque | 157 Nm | 320 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Length | 4160 mm | 4805 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1590 mm | 1810 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1400 mm | 1450 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2480 mm | 2700 mm |