1972 Mazda RX-2 vs. 2011 Audi A3
To start off, 2011 Audi A3 is newer by 39 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1972 Mazda RX-2. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1972 Mazda RX-2 would be higher. At 2,292 cc, 1972 Mazda RX-2 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1972 Mazda RX-2 (118 HP) has 14 more horse power than 2011 Audi A3. (104 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1972 Mazda RX-2 should accelerate faster than 2011 Audi A3.
Because 1972 Mazda RX-2 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1972 Mazda RX-2. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2011 Audi A3, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1972 Mazda RX-2 | 2011 Audi A3 | |
| Make | Mazda | Audi |
| Model | RX-2 | A3 |
| Year Released | 1972 | 2011 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2292 cc | 1200 cc |
| Engine Type | dual-disk rotary | in-line |
| Horse Power | 118 HP | 104 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
