1972 Mazda RX-2 vs. 2012 Chevrolet Camaro
To start off, 2012 Chevrolet Camaro is newer by 40 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1972 Mazda RX-2. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1972 Mazda RX-2 would be higher. At 6,200 cc (8 cylinders), 2012 Chevrolet Camaro is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Chevrolet Camaro (580 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 462 more horse power than 1972 Mazda RX-2. (118 HP @ 6500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Chevrolet Camaro should accelerate faster than 1972 Mazda RX-2.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2012 Chevrolet Camaro (753 Nm @ 4200 RPM) has 596 more torque (in Nm) than 1972 Mazda RX-2. (157 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 2012 Chevrolet Camaro will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1972 Mazda RX-2.
Compare all specifications:
1972 Mazda RX-2 | 2012 Chevrolet Camaro | |
Make | Mazda | Chevrolet |
Model | RX-2 | Camaro |
Year Released | 1972 | 2012 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2292 cc | 6200 cc |
Engine Type | dual-disk rotary | V |
Horse Power | 118 HP | 580 HP |
Engine RPM | 6500 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 157 Nm | 753 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3500 RPM | 4200 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Vehicle Length | 4160 mm | 4836 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1590 mm | 1918 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1400 mm | 1389 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2480 mm | 2852 mm |