1972 Mazda RX-2 vs. 2013 Mini Roadster
To start off, 2013 Mini Roadster is newer by 41 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1972 Mazda RX-2. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1972 Mazda RX-2 would be higher. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Mini Roadster weights approximately 285 kg more than 1972 Mazda RX-2.
Because 1972 Mazda RX-2 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1972 Mazda RX-2. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2013 Mini Roadster, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2013 Mini Roadster (260 Nm @ 4500 RPM) has 103 more torque (in Nm) than 1972 Mazda RX-2. (157 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 2013 Mini Roadster will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1972 Mazda RX-2.
Compare all specifications:
1972 Mazda RX-2 | 2013 Mini Roadster | |
Make | Mazda | Mini |
Model | RX-2 | Roadster |
Year Released | 1972 | 2013 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Type | dual-disk rotary | in-line |
Horse Power | 118 HP | 0 HP |
Engine RPM | 6500 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Torque | 157 Nm | 260 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3500 RPM | 4500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 960 kg | 1245 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4160 mm | 3734 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1590 mm | 1892 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1400 mm | 1390 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2480 mm | 2467 mm |